Verified answer

Gotta love their excuses. Their most famous one is "But its other men who want that, not us!!!"... Lol, well even though partially true (a lot of men feel the need to protect women from risky roles)... It still didn't answer your question.

Your question was more along the lines of... if they honestly were for equality, why don't they fight for the right to responsibility, risk, and self-protection anywhere nearly as much as they fight for goodies, freebies, and special treatments?

Its not even a small difference. Its not like they fight for freebies 60% of the time and for more responsibility and self-protection 40% of the time. Its more like a 1000 to 1 ratio in their literature and their debate topics. There's a 1000 works on "why can't we have more privileges" for every 1 work or mention of "why can't we take more risks/responsibilities"

It's amusing to see a feminist pretend that IT'S MEN who don't want women in the armed forces... Because men have to sign up to the (potential) draft in order to be allowed to vote and get college loans.

When feminists complained about not having the vote and demanded 'equality' - they 'forgot' (conveniently) to ask for FULL equality... instead, they have the benefits of the vote - without ANY of the (careful... here comes a swear word in feminist terms) without ANY of the *responsibilities* that go hand in hand with the right to vote.

Indeed - I'd prefer that neither sex be forced into combat to protect the other sex... but let's face it, feminists will NEVER demand true, full, absolute equality - because true, full, absolute equality would be detrimental to themselves.

You ask a question that has been answered ad nauseum here, with a resounding YES.

It's not feminists who say "women and children first"--it's MEN.

It's not feminists who say "no women in combat"--It's MEN.

So, whine at your bros, bro.

You ever heard of Adolf Hitler?

He will protect us from the cummunist feminnist jews.