There's a huge gap between rich and poor.
Nearly everyone has a gun because they are all conscripted into the military.
The state sponsors one religion.
It's a pretty homogenous society.
Everyone works for their food or they will starve.
Criticizing the governments leads to torture.
What do you think?
Update:-----
Tripp Smith - Keep repeating that mantra, it might become true one day. What I am saying is what conservatives want here, right?
Copyright © 2024 QUIZLS.COM - All rights reserved.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
To be fair,
North Korea is a mesh of extremist views left and right. I see the political spectrum as a compass... the very far left and right are the same thing ultimately.
There are great countries on the left (Sweden) and great on the right (Singapore... just don't throw trash on the ground).
People need not be so entrenched in their ideology. There are good ideas on both sides, why not combine them? Singapore for example values healthcare and education highly, so their people enjoy more social benefits, but are ironically MORE capitalist than the USA.
You realize NK is communist right? With the all-powerful government that conservatives despise? And it's tough to talk about a gap between the rich and poor when 99.999% of the country is dirt poor and .001% is rich. Basically the entire country is poor except for a few political elites.
USSR was socialist and crashed after being a super power. Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, to name a few others. Socialized healthcare is socialist, so is bigger government and trying to even out the wealth... sound at all familiar? I guess if you want to be like those countries you should bash on libertarians who believe that capitalism is what created our country. As for me I don't want to live in those countries. Think of America and how quickly it rose to be one of the most prosperous countries in the world. In less than 200 years it surpassed hundreds of countries that have been around for hundreds or thousands of years. If you believe that was larger government and a non capitalistic system you're mistaken.
It's a politician's dream country, because the government can function without interference from the citizens, always questioning their actions. Your average citizen, conservative or liberal would find the place to be a nightmare, since the people have no freedom.
People don't stay in the military there because they get a gun, they stay because military personnel are fed regularly.
It is from a developers and business persons point of view because of the cheap labour.
It isn't from a developers and business persons point of view because the government makes all the rules and keeps most of the profits of your business as the government owns everything.
In 1995, the Clinton Administration changed the law governing GSEs’ mission — the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) — to encourage more lending in poor neighborhoods. Previously, the CRA directed government to monitor banks’ lending practices to make sure they did not violate fair lending rules in poor neighborhoods. With the 1995 change, the government published each bank’s lending activity and started giving bank ratings based primarily upon the amount of lending it performed in poor neighborhoods. These changes empowered community organizations, such as ACORN, to pressure banks to increase lending activities in poorer neighborhoods — which involved reducing mortgage loan standards — or face backlash from those organizations’ private and political associates. For instance, if Chase made 100 mortgages in a poor Chicago district, and Countrywide 150, the government would likely give Chase a lower CRA rating, and community organizers could pressure politicians to make it more difficult for Chase to get licensed to do full ranges of business in new areas of the country. Low CRA ratings could also disadvantage Chase with regard to government lending programs and make it more difficult for Chase to participate in mergers and acquisitions.
Through Fannie Mae, the government controlled banks’ mortgage lending activity rates. As long as Fannie was willing to buy these mortgages, banks had no problem lowering their standards if necessary, making the loans and selling them off to Fannie Mae. Banks could even buy the mortgages back from Fannie Mae, with Fannie’s payment guarantee, thereby eliminating the credit risk (as long as Fannie was government backed). Now, if the US federal government is behind Fannie – and the government has a perfect credit record – there is really little worry for banks, so they might as well make all the mortgages Fannie Mae is willing to buy, and purchase all the guaranteed debt Fannie puts up for sale. However, to the extent investors ever believed Fannie was just like any other company — without the US government guaranteeing its debts, at least in bulk — well that would be a different story. The risks involved would go from theoretically near zero, to well, who knows… Throughout the Congressional debate on GSE regulations in 2003-2005, senior Congressional Democrats repeatedly inferred — even directly stated on at least one public occasion — the US federal government would bail Fannie Mae out if required
No. It is a DICTATOR's paradise. Republicans do not support dictators unlike libbies like Sean Penn and Harry Belefonte!
“POLITICAL CORRECTNESS is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the CLEAN END.” --- Former US Senator from Wyoming, Alan K. Simpson
Republican since before she was born… and PROUD of it.
North Korea has zero economic freedom. The answer of course would be no.
Socialist Dems ring a bell.
they musta been slackin off 93-98,,,,,,,,2,000,000 uvem starved to deaft
you see the world through intellectual stove burner lids,not THAT kind of lid u dope
47,000,000 in the US get food stamps,yer well paid govermint boyz musta been lootin the till,like the NK people starved so the army could eat like keentuckih razorbacks,,
u musta partied withem,
the n koreans thatis,
hogs is self respectin after all
No they are Communist and thus following the teachings of Karl Marx which are very left wing