Verified answer

There are single quotation marks, which are written either using the symbol ‘ for the opening quotation mark and ’ for the closing quotation mark, or the symbol ' for both.

There are double quotation marks, which are written either using the symbol “ for the opening quotation mark and ” for the closing quotation marks, or the symbol " for both.

In current North American usage, generally the double quotation marks have priority.

North American usage:

John asked, “Did Simon say, ‘I believe in “life”; I believe in “mercy”, and I believe in “death”’?”

John asked, "Did Simon say, 'I believe in "life''; I believe in "mercy", and I believe in "death"'?"

See http://www.senecac.on.ca/library/Research_Help/Cit... .

Note that if you are writing that sentence itself, as part of an article written in APA format, you would put the commas inside the quotation marks. But if you are quoting it from another author, you will use the punctuation preferred by that author, save for changing double quotation marks to single quotation marks and single quotation marks to double quotation marks if the nesting level requires this.

Very confusing to respond to. Even that small e book, "call to the country" and the rates in it, are previous words! One quote that i found to be extremely uncommon, very uncommon, and there fore it regarded somewhat particular... "in addition, if I do a superior action, there is not any skill in the universe that could quit its bearing solid outcomes. (I.80 2)" .. This quote is component of 2d para of web page 60 of the e book 'call to the country'. What i found particular is this takes away a large burden off, from the human options. we choose no longer "keep money owed" of solid issues that we do. the most straightforward project is that solid movements (existence-constructive movements) frequently go unrewarded, unrecognised, and consequently, the calculative options frequently discourages us. .. This quote is in simple terms the "communicate" theorem of the Karmic regulation, 'evil movements in no way go unpunished'. (We heard plenty, and maximum human beings, out of a few blind concern, attempt to keep ourselves faraway from detrimental deeds. yet, we also hesitate to finish somewhat constructive deeds, the position situation facilitates us, expects us to do!). once this 'calculative' options is consoled, our inner skill receives opened up immensely. Now, all we favor to do is discover the very similar logical options, look on the priority, and settle on even if a deed is wisely worth it. Which in simple terms skill, we choose no longer be even stupidly charitable, the position the priority does no longer deserve in any respect! (the translation and alertness of those efficient rates makes it effective!)