One of the easiest ways of explaining this is by using Taylor expansions of e^x, sin(x) and cos(x). Those are ways of approximating these functions by polynomials. It can be shown that 1 + x + x^2/2 + x^3/6 + ... + x^n / (n!) + ... will converge to e^x. The function sin(x) can be represented as x - x^3/6 + x^5/5! - x^7/7! + ... The function cos(x) can be represented by 1 - x^2/2 + x^4/4! - x^6/6! + ...
Now, what happens if we take e(ix) ? We get 1 + ix - x^2/2 - ix^3/6 + x^4/4! ...
This is exactly equal to cos(x) + i sin(x). Fill in x = π, and you get cos(π) + i sin(π) = -1 + i*0 = -1.
THERE ARE 2 DEFINITIONS/INTERPRETATIONS the suitable quantity of documents denoted via a gigabyte (or megabyte or kilobyte) is a fruitful source of bewilderment, because of the fact there are 2 diverse definitions and from time to time it isn't any longer sparkling from the context which one is getting used. a million. THE DECIMAL PREFIXES If the prefixes kilo, mega, giga, and so on. are to be interpreted as decimal prefixes, the quantity denoted via the contraptions differs via component to one thousand. which potential: a million kilobyte = one thousand bytes a million megabyte = one thousand kilobytes a million gigabyte = one thousand megabytes and so on. 2. THE BINARY PREFIXES If the prefixes kilo, mega, giga, and so on. are to be interpreted as binary prefixes, the quantity denoted via the contraptions differs via component to 1024. which potential: a million kilobyte = 1024 bytes a million megabyte = 1024 kilobytes a million gigabyte = 1024 megabytes and so on. SO HOW DO i be conscious of WHICH ONE IS getting used? you do no longer, except the textual content textile/sheet/kit explicitly states which one is getting used. even in spite of the undeniable fact that, there are some regulations of thumb that would want that could be useful you: - difficultchronic manufacturers generally specify the dimensions of a disk employing the decimal prefixes - maximum working systems use the binary prefixes to tutor the dimensions of a report (no longer all of them, in spite of the undeniable fact that; Mac OS 10.6 and a few Linux systems use the decimal contraptions) - on technical sheets you will generally discover a footnote that tells you which of them definition is getting used
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
OK, Take a deep breath:
One proves in elementary calculus (it's an easy
application of MacLaurin's formula) that for all real x
e^x = 1 + x/1! + x²/2! + x³/3! + x⁴/4! +...
cosx = 1 - x²/2! + x⁴/4! - x⁶/6! +...
sinx = x - x³/3! + x⁵/5! -... .
(I suppose you know that n!, read "n factorial", stands for the
product of all integers from 1 to n. Thus 4! = 1·2·3·4 = 24)
Formally DEFINING e^x, sinx and cosx for imaginary x by those formulas
(there are, after all, no imaginary angles to take their sine and cosine!)
we get the famous formula e^(it) = cost + i·sint
(just substitute it for x in e^x and separate real from purely imaginary terms,
remembering that even powers of i are real and odd powers imaginary).
If t=π, we get e^(iπ) = cosπ+isiniπ = -1+ι0 = -1, an amazing result indeed!
One of the easiest ways of explaining this is by using Taylor expansions of e^x, sin(x) and cos(x). Those are ways of approximating these functions by polynomials. It can be shown that 1 + x + x^2/2 + x^3/6 + ... + x^n / (n!) + ... will converge to e^x. The function sin(x) can be represented as x - x^3/6 + x^5/5! - x^7/7! + ... The function cos(x) can be represented by 1 - x^2/2 + x^4/4! - x^6/6! + ...
Now, what happens if we take e(ix) ? We get 1 + ix - x^2/2 - ix^3/6 + x^4/4! ...
This is exactly equal to cos(x) + i sin(x). Fill in x = π, and you get cos(π) + i sin(π) = -1 + i*0 = -1.
THERE ARE 2 DEFINITIONS/INTERPRETATIONS the suitable quantity of documents denoted via a gigabyte (or megabyte or kilobyte) is a fruitful source of bewilderment, because of the fact there are 2 diverse definitions and from time to time it isn't any longer sparkling from the context which one is getting used. a million. THE DECIMAL PREFIXES If the prefixes kilo, mega, giga, and so on. are to be interpreted as decimal prefixes, the quantity denoted via the contraptions differs via component to one thousand. which potential: a million kilobyte = one thousand bytes a million megabyte = one thousand kilobytes a million gigabyte = one thousand megabytes and so on. 2. THE BINARY PREFIXES If the prefixes kilo, mega, giga, and so on. are to be interpreted as binary prefixes, the quantity denoted via the contraptions differs via component to 1024. which potential: a million kilobyte = 1024 bytes a million megabyte = 1024 kilobytes a million gigabyte = 1024 megabytes and so on. SO HOW DO i be conscious of WHICH ONE IS getting used? you do no longer, except the textual content textile/sheet/kit explicitly states which one is getting used. even in spite of the undeniable fact that, there are some regulations of thumb that would want that could be useful you: - difficultchronic manufacturers generally specify the dimensions of a disk employing the decimal prefixes - maximum working systems use the binary prefixes to tutor the dimensions of a report (no longer all of them, in spite of the undeniable fact that; Mac OS 10.6 and a few Linux systems use the decimal contraptions) - on technical sheets you will generally discover a footnote that tells you which of them definition is getting used
In forth answer angle is in radians. Using first and second wonder limits and ading i as common number one can prove this very well.
e^(iπ) = 1/2(e^(iπ) + e^(-iπ)) + 1/2(e^(iπ) - e^(-iπ)) = cos π + i sin π
= -1
e is the limiting value as n tends to infinity of (1 + 1/n)^n which is approx. 2.71828182846
Recall Euler's identity;
e^(iθ) = cos(θ) + isin(θ)
e^(i*π) = cos(π) + isin(π) = -1