I don't think it's a toxic gender role per se'. It's natural for a man to be more ambitious because of testosterone. Testosterone and estrogen vary greatly in regards to trust, risk, altruism, mindfulness and focus. There are more provider men because of naturalistic differences in physical biology.

All of the other nonsense promoted by feminists, sjw's, etc trying to reinvent the socio economic wheel is a product of willful ignorance due to being jealous of the things that men are naturally better at. It would kind of be like a lion being jealous of a shark because it can breathe under water.

It is toxic that a man would get duped in to providing for a female on the notion that she has sex with him, cleans, cooks, etc - when all aspects of the cliche 'advantages' regarding the constant presence of a female can be had without a commitment and with relative ease.

False.

I've worked all my life and support myself. So do a lot of other women

True, everyone saying that it is false is obviously either a female trying to "defend" women or a "white knight" trying to defend a women's honor for p**** points.

You have asked two misogynistic questions today. If you don't like women and don't want to support someone supposedly living in the lap of luxury, then just don't have a relationship, or be so poor that no semblance of luxury is possible. Enjoy your sex doll and leave real women alone.

False.

How many couples do you know who have this kind of relationship in real life? I don't know any.

No, what nonsense. Learn some punctuation and you won't have to slave.

False on all points.