Verified answer

She’s not excessively bad. Though the series, in my view, was excessively BAD; bursting with middle aged women who could not stop crowing on at each other. My idea of acute pain would be spending a night watching the re-runs. AWFUL. Her winey voice in the narrative is by no means something you young ladies should think of as anything but winey and self indulgent.

BARR Humbug .

Yeah, they would have picked any person drop lifeless wonderful, however it might remove from the show. She would not have got to be lovely for the exhibit to work. Would you decide upon a much less proficient actress who simply occurred to look better? I doubt the show would had been as successful because it was once without Sarah Jessica Parker, who I happen to consider is beautiful. Not conventionally, but in a unusual method.

She's not completely unfortunate looking, but I've always wondered why do people categorize her as beautiful or pretty - she's neither. To be honest I was surprised when Matthew Broderick married her. . she's a great dresser, but she looks old in the face. . I recently saw her in Failure to Launch and I was like ugh. . . she just doesn't do it for me.

I don't think she is pretty. Her features don't go together well at all. She is very confident in her looks, however. It just goes to show you that if you are confident about your looks, then you can fool a lot of people.

Truthfully? Nope. But I love her show!

she looks like a witch. she has that big pimple/beauty mark (YEAH RIGHT) on her chin that she is always trying to cover.

she's alright but I wouldn't describe her as sexy.

I don't think she's attractive at all !!!!!!!! I totally agree with you :-)

you are absolutely correct.... she is ok

I think people mistake petite for pretty

i totally agree with u! she is very nice, but not gorgeous!