According to my university lecturer, people cite wikipedia in their assignments constantly. Students now get marked down for it. I like to read what's on there but I wouldn't be stupid enough to cite it in an assignment.
We americans are a bunch of lazy @$$holes. It's the only solution. Even worse, people use Yahoo Answers and get "our advice" on the best answers. Where in the end, this is just a site for pure boredom folks like me who waste there time getting 2pts for every question. Golly Gee this is fun.
Ultimately a voice of rationale. Folks are normally joking round on right here asking none severe questions and that fairly,relatively MAKES ME VERY MAD. I am so mad proper now just occupied with it,i am shaking. I'm going to blow a fuse.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
According to my university lecturer, people cite wikipedia in their assignments constantly. Students now get marked down for it. I like to read what's on there but I wouldn't be stupid enough to cite it in an assignment.
We americans are a bunch of lazy @$$holes. It's the only solution. Even worse, people use Yahoo Answers and get "our advice" on the best answers. Where in the end, this is just a site for pure boredom folks like me who waste there time getting 2pts for every question. Golly Gee this is fun.
Yes. And Wikipedia is as reliable as Encyclopedia Britannica. No jokes.
Ultimately a voice of rationale. Folks are normally joking round on right here asking none severe questions and that fairly,relatively MAKES ME VERY MAD. I am so mad proper now just occupied with it,i am shaking. I'm going to blow a fuse.
never mind about the reliability, what about the technical english they use that no one other than literature experts understand?