Yeah, I do. He's billed as 6 feet 11, and 299 pounds. That's pretty big.
But not only do I consider him as a big man wrestler, I consider him one of the best big men wrestlers. I mean, he's definitely up there.
He's agile for a man of his size, and pretty much able to do things other men of his size can't. I mean, he's able to balance on the ropes to deliver Old School. He's able to deliver a No Handed Suicide Dive over the top rope to opponents on the outside. He's pretty quick in the ring, dictating the pace of the match and calling the shots.
So even though he's a big man wrestler, I don't think of him as other big wrestlers like Mark Henry, who are pretty slow in the ring.
I think The Undertaker isn't super heavyweight wrestler anymore ever since his weight down to 299 lbs. Now, The Undertaker's just a heavyweight wrestler.
But, anyway, I still consider The Undertaker as a big man wrestler because of his almost 7 feet height, so yes, The Undertaker should be considered as a big man wrestler.
Also, a guy whose weight is over 280 lbs should also be considered a big man wrestler.
Yes i consider Undertaker as a big man wrestler. He's achieved everything a wrestler would want to in the WWE and the wrestling industry.
18-0 at Wrestlemania
Greatest Gimmicks
Greatest Moveset
Greatest Charisma
Former WWF Champion
Former World Champion
Former Undisputed Champion
Former World Tag Team Champion
Former Hardcore Champion
2007 Royal Rumble Winner
He's done it all. He has it all. He could retire if he wanted to, but he has one more goal, the Hall of Fame. He could retire before that if he wants, but he probably and hopefully won't.
There are many other 'big guys' in the WWE that have had their share of success. Hulk Hogan, Kane, Big Show, Kevin Nash, Andre the Giant and so on. But nobody could ever compare to Taker's achievements.
I mean you would have to. If you compare him to wrestlers such as Giant Gonzales and The Great Khali, he pales in comparison but you would have to, no doubt. But, compared to every other wrestler that is not over 300 pounds which there has been hundreds throughout the history of the wrestling industry, he is a big man overall. Even though he is a big man wrestler, he moves around the ring like a middle weight and wrestles better than over half of the younger guys. So I would consider him a big man wrestler overall.
Sure do. Why? it's obvious. Not too many men are as tall as he is. Compare Sting to Undertaker and Sting is much more around the average height of a man. See the difference?
super Gonzales for sure. He did no longer final interior the corporate in any respect, could no longer try against for nuts, and it replaced into additionally the sole adventure which Taker won by potential of way of DQ and it replaced into no longer even a pinfall or a submission. Worst adventure, worst opponent. the subsequent would be A-prepare, and the subsequent Mark Henry. nevertheless that replaced into no longer the worst casket adventure of all time - the worst casket adventure of all time replaced into the single with massive slow in 2008 on another PPV.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
Yeah, I do. He's billed as 6 feet 11, and 299 pounds. That's pretty big.
But not only do I consider him as a big man wrestler, I consider him one of the best big men wrestlers. I mean, he's definitely up there.
He's agile for a man of his size, and pretty much able to do things other men of his size can't. I mean, he's able to balance on the ropes to deliver Old School. He's able to deliver a No Handed Suicide Dive over the top rope to opponents on the outside. He's pretty quick in the ring, dictating the pace of the match and calling the shots.
So even though he's a big man wrestler, I don't think of him as other big wrestlers like Mark Henry, who are pretty slow in the ring.
Yeah, but now not really.
I think The Undertaker isn't super heavyweight wrestler anymore ever since his weight down to 299 lbs. Now, The Undertaker's just a heavyweight wrestler.
But, anyway, I still consider The Undertaker as a big man wrestler because of his almost 7 feet height, so yes, The Undertaker should be considered as a big man wrestler.
Also, a guy whose weight is over 280 lbs should also be considered a big man wrestler.
Yes i consider Undertaker as a big man wrestler. He's achieved everything a wrestler would want to in the WWE and the wrestling industry.
18-0 at Wrestlemania
Greatest Gimmicks
Greatest Moveset
Greatest Charisma
Former WWF Champion
Former World Champion
Former Undisputed Champion
Former World Tag Team Champion
Former Hardcore Champion
2007 Royal Rumble Winner
He's done it all. He has it all. He could retire if he wanted to, but he has one more goal, the Hall of Fame. He could retire before that if he wants, but he probably and hopefully won't.
There are many other 'big guys' in the WWE that have had their share of success. Hulk Hogan, Kane, Big Show, Kevin Nash, Andre the Giant and so on. But nobody could ever compare to Taker's achievements.
I mean you would have to. If you compare him to wrestlers such as Giant Gonzales and The Great Khali, he pales in comparison but you would have to, no doubt. But, compared to every other wrestler that is not over 300 pounds which there has been hundreds throughout the history of the wrestling industry, he is a big man overall. Even though he is a big man wrestler, he moves around the ring like a middle weight and wrestles better than over half of the younger guys. So I would consider him a big man wrestler overall.
Yes. Anyone 6'4 and over I consider a big man wrestler
Sure do. Why? it's obvious. Not too many men are as tall as he is. Compare Sting to Undertaker and Sting is much more around the average height of a man. See the difference?
Undertaker is a big man. I don't consider him a giant though
Yes,because he is billed as 6'10(sometime 7 feet).Also Jim Ross refers to Undertaker as WWE's best big man.
I consider the Undertaker a fake wrestler who make millions of idiots who watch him
super Gonzales for sure. He did no longer final interior the corporate in any respect, could no longer try against for nuts, and it replaced into additionally the sole adventure which Taker won by potential of way of DQ and it replaced into no longer even a pinfall or a submission. Worst adventure, worst opponent. the subsequent would be A-prepare, and the subsequent Mark Henry. nevertheless that replaced into no longer the worst casket adventure of all time - the worst casket adventure of all time replaced into the single with massive slow in 2008 on another PPV.