I think who ever is getting rudi is getting the better end because rudi right now is number one in cinncy and peterson may be splitting carries with taylor when taylor gets back
no way. don't do it. Adrian Peterson may be rookie of the year this year but he is on a suck *** team and Rudi Johnson is just a beast. He can blow through you even if he was on a bad team.
this is a tough one because i think adrian petersen will likely have a good season 1200-1500 yards, but i think rudi johnson will also have around that too, but i think i would just keep adrian peterson.
the players are about even and projected now to have similar numbers for the year. i would not do it unless other positional players are involved. there is no point of trading one player for the exact player.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
I think who ever is getting rudi is getting the better end because rudi right now is number one in cinncy and peterson may be splitting carries with taylor when taylor gets back
If you are the one getting Johnson, DO NOT DO IT!!!! He is out for this week:
Bengals | R. Johnson out for Week 4
Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:28:18 -0700
Mark Curnutte, of the Cincinnati Enquirer, reports Cincinnati Bengals RB Rudi Johnson (hamstring) will not play Week 4.
And who knows how long it takes for a hammy to heal. Sometimes all season. If you are dealing him away, DO IT NOW!!!!!
Good luck.
no way. don't do it. Adrian Peterson may be rookie of the year this year but he is on a suck *** team and Rudi Johnson is just a beast. He can blow through you even if he was on a bad team.
this is a tough one because i think adrian petersen will likely have a good season 1200-1500 yards, but i think rudi johnson will also have around that too, but i think i would just keep adrian peterson.
THEY ARE both decent running back..but i think rudi is an little better than peterson but the are both really good players
Rudi has a bad hami. You don't want to trade for him. Peterson is a #1 back. Trade someone else.
the players are about even and projected now to have similar numbers for the year. i would not do it unless other positional players are involved. there is no point of trading one player for the exact player.