HUGE POTENTIAL TRADE....?
A trade has been propposed to me. I have Hines Ward, Brandon Jacobs and Jacksonville defense. In return, I'm being offered Santonio Holmes, Clinton Portis and Chicago Defense.
My starting team is as follows:
Donovan McNabb
Terrell Owens
Larry Fitzgerald
Roy Williams
Brandon Jacobs
Larry Johnson
Dallas Clark
Mason Crosby
Jacksonville Defense
bench:
John Kitna
DeSean Jackson
Eddie Royal
Hines Ward
Thomas Jones
Darren McFadden
Should I pull the trigger on this one?
More Questions From This User See All
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
Its a gamble if you ask me the way your bench looks and your current roster the only thing that is really going to make a difference is the Def. because u have TO and Larry Fitz and desean jackson is gonna be a stud that could put up a lot of points. also you have thomas jones, who i think will have a better year than Jacobs because of all the things the jets have done. IMO this is a good deal if you wanna take the risk on a a better def.
OMG. I can't believe people are hedging on this.
#1. SELL WARD HIGH WHILE YOU CAN. Holmes will be the consistent one, no doubt in my mind. Plus, Ward's health is a liability. You want someone on your bench who will be healthy when you need him. A reliable backup.
#2. Clinton Portis is a beast, way better than Jacobs. Not to mention he's a workhorse and gets virtually all the carries for Washington. Jacobs shares touches. Portis was top 5 in fantasy production last year and with Campbell stinking it up at QB still, the Redskins will have to continue to run the ball well and often, to compete.
#3.The Bears defense is greater than the Jags. Not that it matters. The upside of this trade was yours even without swapping defenses.
You win on all fronts. Do it before he reconsiders.
I say don't do it. Ward looks like he's gonna be Big Ben's #1 WR this year, as long as he stays healthy, he'll put up better numbers than Holmes. The RBs are even, and I give Chicago's D a slight edge, but not enough to make up for what you would lose from giving up Ward.
The funds is over 12 trillion dollars, Im particular he can discover some way of reducing the 9 trillion greenback deficit. The financial device doesnt have lots to do with what the president does, yet how lots human beings have faith in him. by way of fact the persons of this united states refuse to agree on something, we are exceptionally lots screwing ourselves, we dont % the president to do it for us and not in any respect did.
I don't think I would take the trade. Not sure why, but I think you have a better long-term set up.
i would not have ask that question.keep what you have .why do you have hines ward on the bench he should be one of your starters.
no. keep ward and jacobs.