Lakers, Magic, Knicks 3 team Trade..?
why dont the lakers, magic and knicks work out this deal..i think its a fair trade for everyone.....amare and melo arent clicking in ny and ppl are suggesting that dwight should land in ny...this would also help the lakers as well as the magic who would make up for the loss of dwight...what do you think..?
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=6q6yxw...
if you like this trade please try and post it on espn..i dont have an account for it...i think this is a viable trade that would make everyone happy..
More Questions From This User See All
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
LOL good luck trying to make melo and kobe play toghether, that is a recipe for disaster.
Knicks = Howard, Chandler, Stoudemire.. that's a pretty expensive front line. Dump Chandler. Receive Turkoglu.
Lakers = Melo, Barnes, World Peace, Kapono, Ebanks, Walton.. how many SFs does this team need? Plus Kobe/Melo will combine for 80% of the team's shots. It'll be like Iverson and Anthony part 2. Nothing good can come from this trade.
Magic = Not getting enough, and they need to dump Turkoglu. Send Turkoglu to the Knicks. Take Morris and/or Ebanks instead of Blake (salary). Receive Chandler.
As a laker fan it is relatively the main suitable obtainable subject, I havnt performed the salaries distinction in spite of the indisputable fact that it appears that evidently like it would artwork. i comprehend Lowry needs out of Houston and coach Kevin Mchale relatively needs Pau gasol. so because it fairly is a distinctive threat. As for the Orlando commerce, i admire that besides, yet i think of they might want extra effective than Blake, Orlando would be very stingy on figuring out to purchase and promoting Dwight.
No it wouldn't make everyone happy. The Lakers wouldn't do that deal.
I don't like it.You need teams to absorb Chandler and Gasol.Kobe and Carmelo won't be able to play off of each other without any big men.
no melo isn't going from NY
Nope, do not like it. Does not make sense.