If my neighbour were to have sex with a child, people with a prolife philosophy would want that person charged and convicted.
If another neighbour were to sell heroin to a child, people with a prolife philosophy would want that person charged and convicted.
Despite calling abortion murder, people with a prolife philosophy never want to see a woman charged with "murdering" her own "child".
Update:Weesie, I don't believe. As my examples indicated, if there was someone selling heroin to children in your neighbourhood, I doubt you would be so calm. I doubt if someone in your neighbourhood were having sex with children, I doubt that you would be so calm.
I think we could actually find out how many women have had abortions in your neighbourhood. You seem quite calm about living amongst women and doctors who you consider to be "murderers".
Copyright © 2024 QUIZLS.COM - All rights reserved.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
that is a far fetched comparison..
a woman is not killing her own child.. abortion can't happen after 3 months of pregnancy... and up until that point there is no child.. it's just forming yet.. it's not a person yet.. it's not completely put together yet...
and what does prolife have to do with an adult having sex with a child.. there is no "murder" there..
and it is a little not realistic that a person would be selling heroin to children.. but if it did happen..it's a crime.. not murder.. and the person will be charged as that..
interesting question
i asked a similar question
before
as
if prochoice
is not neccesarily saying go out and have an abortion but simply it is the womans own free will and right to choose
then why isnt everyone pro choice
if it means its your own belief
where as
prolifers
condone others and seemingly nullify any reason but their own facist religious views
what amazes me is everyone who is prolife
says OMG your killing a innocent baby
yet we have no problem blowing the **** out of other countrys who dont see the same religious view as us
we dont have a problem
letting animals go to slaughter for our own selfish needs
and what exactly do prolifers have to say about the rape case
i had a friend whos
by age 11 she was brutally raped and had to have an abortion
because her body literaly couldnt take it due to her ilness nd it ws eitehr she die or the baby dies
yet do you remember the pain you felt when the doctor slapped you on the butt when you were born, probably not and that was when you were full 9 months born
not 2 to 3
as well with the evergrowing populous of sex influenced tv shows like gossip girl and the OC
which promotes teenage sex
and with teens having sex at younger and younger ages
we eventualy are giong to turn into china and have to establish a 1 child per family issue.
prolifers are fckng assholes who dont ever consider anything but their own selfish wants nd needs
they dont know the whole cituation of the woman
or generally anything about the woman
and i know most women wont just have an abortion and feel guilt free about it .
Most conscientious mothers will not send their children to war, to dangerous places, into volatile and threatening situations. Most women will not create a child without enduring they have the means and support to give to that child the perfect home environment and parentage. Thinking women will not lumber a child with a life sentence because they failed to take precautions, or made love without momentary thought for the outcome or consequences.
Foolish women look upon children as accessories, they go to third world countries and pick up a bargain to allay pangs of loneliness because they are unable to hold down a relationship, foolish women have babies, and live on state welfare in abject conditions because they wanted and I quote ‘’something to love that will love them back’’ unquote. Foolish women become pregnant to ensure a man and force him to commit where there was no love involved, damning a child to be raised in a loveless home.
Some women become pregnant to reinforce bonds within a marriage and find the reverse occurs, the child becomes integral to a party where the man required attention, and has now been further down placed justifiably, ‘’for the child’’ causing ill will and resentment. Do gooders condemn both mother and child to a life time of struggle and suffering when they force a woman to raise a child she didn’t want, condemning both to a life sentence for a momentary lapse of good judgment.
The child must come first, the state may require industrial fodder to man their offices and factories, and use any political ,means and psychological warfare to ensure women produce children without any real commitment to easing social problems, divisions and crimes, family breakdowns, divorce, abuse and neglect. Women in offices of power rarely have children and have no vested interest to better social conditions or the deteriorating family, essential to raise well balanced children. Atheism, extremism, hate are all incited by unloved and abused children grown into adults and seeking vengeance upon society.
Let the powers in government right his world prior to demanding women produce parts of their soul and being to populate a loveless and suffering war torn globe...
first one has to define life. no one is going to state when a fetus becomes child legally. but it is generally considered murder if the fetus is more than 3 months along. such things as partial birth are just not looked kindly on.
why do they not want them see charged with it? because they know it would never fly.
I am a pro-lifer and oh, yes, I think that a mother and her doctor should be charged with murder for the abortion of her child. What gave you the idea that pro-lifers felt differently?
Good question.. something i will never understand about republicans.