As the president of the USA, he is suppose to be more of a leader.... not just leading the country but also representing a fair democracy to the world...
Now the question is whether or not he is a successful leader or not... results have shown the answer to that question is NO. I really think GWBush is going to go down in history as the worst president the USA ever experienced.
leader~exposed his life & ours to the todays warfare of cells and the movement that creates expensive oposition to classify as a previously referred to term as a war. war does have bounderies- he exposed the uselessness of conventional battles in bring idiots like sadum who were lost in the share magnatude of american power~but still it drains the nations resources & china hold our i.o.u's for allot of the cost too. bush has exposed the "soft on war" that is tactically holding the middle east from uniting and sturing up more hostilities, so how to murder and look neigborly has its draw backs that are exstremely costly and deadly as it is unresolvable in style of completness in it televising. this is bush the leader, he is held accountable and has not created a world war out of it and that was the deadliest potential that the eruption in the middle east could cause
manager~that is allot like a information port~
as for the part...tell me what you think and why~
it is in history that our greatest emenie lies, we were of the the sorted type that were unconventional in battle, remember the kentuckey john wayne films that were sniper fire and not british stand and volley guys of the regulars, so here is the evidence that convects us to our guilt trips we suffer in battles of today. the battles are in our minds they are the product of learned behaviorism and have hard wiring in our port of view~we gather information and war has never sessed in history long enough to guide to better ways of coercing ignorances like underestimating the super power we are but, the costs are so vastly assumed by the cells that are not in the battle and have moved on to fund other ignorant people to die for a cause, if u understand rocket science u have enough mind to create peace but if u don't have anything the terrioist have fed on these unachievers to make america vastly underprotected. neither the manager or the leader can offer the resolutions nessasary to educate the enemie before he is committed to his crime, all hitler had to do was feed the civilians and they were his power-power corrupts so were do u teach is the solution~we may have overeducated us to the point we in america understand too much about war, and the rest of the world is information gathering~shouldn't it be information destributing & food, so we don't repeat the past
Yes, he's a puppet. He's a mediocre son of a very wealthy family. Granddaddy Bush put the wealth together - his spawn never had to do much other than play with the fortune.
A manager deals mostly with facts and figures and delegates authority. But that's what congress is for.
A president is supposed to lead his country in the proper direction. Whether one thinks Bush is leading us in the right direction or not, one must admit that's what he's trying to do.
I don't think he is either. I think he is a arrogant inheritor of wealth (= power) and shares a mindset of economic facism with his corporate cronies. The fact that the former CEO of Halliburton is the Vice President, and Halliburton is the number 1 reciever of no bid contracts (and there is 2 billion in audited funds unaccounted for) is appaling. The lack of outcry worries me.
Well, I'd have to say that he has lead us in to a useless and unnecessary war, he has managed to appoint the most inept and incompetent people to his cabinet, and he has lead me to believe that the Republican Party is full of arrogant elitists who prefer to serve themselves, while screwing Middle-Class Americans by sending jobs over-seas, rather then serve the people of this nation! All-in-all, if he is either of those two things -he isn't very good!
He is just a puppet, or as you say 'manager'. To make it short - The bankers are the puppet masters. The two videos I placed will explain most of the big picture.
President Bush is a leader because he can let other people like the soldiers do what he wants even when there are many Americans that are against his policies. The Democrats cannot even impeached him and even supports his declarations.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
As the president of the USA, he is suppose to be more of a leader.... not just leading the country but also representing a fair democracy to the world...
Now the question is whether or not he is a successful leader or not... results have shown the answer to that question is NO. I really think GWBush is going to go down in history as the worst president the USA ever experienced.
leader~exposed his life & ours to the todays warfare of cells and the movement that creates expensive oposition to classify as a previously referred to term as a war. war does have bounderies- he exposed the uselessness of conventional battles in bring idiots like sadum who were lost in the share magnatude of american power~but still it drains the nations resources & china hold our i.o.u's for allot of the cost too. bush has exposed the "soft on war" that is tactically holding the middle east from uniting and sturing up more hostilities, so how to murder and look neigborly has its draw backs that are exstremely costly and deadly as it is unresolvable in style of completness in it televising. this is bush the leader, he is held accountable and has not created a world war out of it and that was the deadliest potential that the eruption in the middle east could cause
manager~that is allot like a information port~
as for the part...tell me what you think and why~
it is in history that our greatest emenie lies, we were of the the sorted type that were unconventional in battle, remember the kentuckey john wayne films that were sniper fire and not british stand and volley guys of the regulars, so here is the evidence that convects us to our guilt trips we suffer in battles of today. the battles are in our minds they are the product of learned behaviorism and have hard wiring in our port of view~we gather information and war has never sessed in history long enough to guide to better ways of coercing ignorances like underestimating the super power we are but, the costs are so vastly assumed by the cells that are not in the battle and have moved on to fund other ignorant people to die for a cause, if u understand rocket science u have enough mind to create peace but if u don't have anything the terrioist have fed on these unachievers to make america vastly underprotected. neither the manager or the leader can offer the resolutions nessasary to educate the enemie before he is committed to his crime, all hitler had to do was feed the civilians and they were his power-power corrupts so were do u teach is the solution~we may have overeducated us to the point we in america understand too much about war, and the rest of the world is information gathering~shouldn't it be information destributing & food, so we don't repeat the past
Yes, he's a puppet. He's a mediocre son of a very wealthy family. Granddaddy Bush put the wealth together - his spawn never had to do much other than play with the fortune.
He's a leader...or at least trying to be.
A manager deals mostly with facts and figures and delegates authority. But that's what congress is for.
A president is supposed to lead his country in the proper direction. Whether one thinks Bush is leading us in the right direction or not, one must admit that's what he's trying to do.
I don't think he is either. I think he is a arrogant inheritor of wealth (= power) and shares a mindset of economic facism with his corporate cronies. The fact that the former CEO of Halliburton is the Vice President, and Halliburton is the number 1 reciever of no bid contracts (and there is 2 billion in audited funds unaccounted for) is appaling. The lack of outcry worries me.
Well, I'd have to say that he has lead us in to a useless and unnecessary war, he has managed to appoint the most inept and incompetent people to his cabinet, and he has lead me to believe that the Republican Party is full of arrogant elitists who prefer to serve themselves, while screwing Middle-Class Americans by sending jobs over-seas, rather then serve the people of this nation! All-in-all, if he is either of those two things -he isn't very good!
He is just a puppet, or as you say 'manager'. To make it short - The bankers are the puppet masters. The two videos I placed will explain most of the big picture.
I dont think people realize what little power a president really has... He cant just up and say "A" and "A" happens. It doesnt work like that..
So if you think what he has the power to do is called managing, fine.... If not, lets call him a leader...
Yes he's managing our nation to the disaster and he's leading just few bone heads who are still following, Why? Actions talk by it selves,
President Bush is a leader because he can let other people like the soldiers do what he wants even when there are many Americans that are against his policies. The Democrats cannot even impeached him and even supports his declarations.